Choose the payroll product first
An agency’s ADP product, country, and contract determine the integration path. Begin with an approved aggregate cost report and a consistent pay-period mapping before modeling capacity.
A useful first workflow
- Choose a reporting period and a named owner for the connection.
- Review the proposed client or team mappings before importing data.
- Keep source totals, imported totals, and unresolved records visible.
- Compare the result with the source system before using it in a client decision.
What the connection should not do
This is a proposed read-only analysis use case. No payroll execution, employee changes, or claim of universal ADP API access is included.
The accounting or payroll platform remains the source of truth. A missing field, expired permission, or incomplete period should be shown as missing—not silently converted to zero. Any future write action would need a separately reviewed permission and an explicit approval step.
From data to a better decision
Use this information to ask whether the team can serve another client sustainably, which services consume too much effort, and whether automation frees time for strategy. Do not call recovered staff hours cash savings unless a real expense falls.
Read the agency margin guide → · Try the savings model →
Implementation reference
ADP platform documentation ↗. Product scope, provider approval, geography, and permissions must be verified during implementation.